President Donald Trump Threatens To Wipe Past Officials' Security Clearances | The 11th Hour | MSNBC

President Donald Trump Threatens To Wipe Past Officials' Security Clearances | The 11th Hour | MSNBC
    Watch the video

    click to begin

    Youtube

    UNDER WAY ON A MONDAY NIGHT. GOOD EVENING ONCE AGAIN IN OUR
    GOOD EVENING ONCE AGAIN IN OUR NBC NEWS HEADQUARTERS HERE IN
    NBC NEWS HEADQUARTERS HERE IN NEW YORK.
    NEW YORK. DAY 550 OF THE TRUMP
    DAY 550 OF THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION.
    ADMINISTRATION. FOR PERSPECTIVE, HELSINKI WAS A
    FOR PERSPECTIVE, HELSINKI WAS A WEEK AGO TODAY.
    WEEK AGO TODAY. FOR THE PAST THREE DAYS, THE
    FOR THE PAST THREE DAYS, THE PRESIDENT EMBARKED ON FRESH NEW
    PRESIDENT EMBARKED ON FRESH NEW ATTACKS ON THE MUELLER
    ATTACKS ON THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION, A WARNING TO
    INVESTIGATION, A WARNING TO IRAN, AND NEW THREATS TO THE
    IRAN, AND NEW THREATS TO THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY.
    INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY. TRUMP'S RENEWED PUSH COMES IN
    TRUMP'S RENEWED PUSH COMES IN THE WAKE OF SCATHING REVIEWS
    THE WAKE OF SCATHING REVIEWS WITH VLADIMIR PUTIN AND COMMENTS
    WITH VLADIMIR PUTIN AND COMMENTS DOUBTING U.S. INTELLIGENCE ON
    DOUBTING U.S. INTELLIGENCE ON RUSSIA'S ELECTION INTERFERENCE.
    RUSSIA'S ELECTION INTERFERENCE. A DOZEN AUDIO TAPES SEIZEED FROM
    A DOZEN AUDIO TAPES SEIZEED FROM MICHAEL COHEN'S OFFICE NOW IN
    MICHAEL COHEN'S OFFICE NOW IN THE HANDS OF FEDS.
    THE HANDS OF FEDS. THE GROWING MUELLER
    THE GROWING MUELLER INVESTIGATION WHICH WILL SOON
    INVESTIGATION WHICH WILL SOON FEATURE THE TRIAL OF HIS FORMER
    FEATURE THE TRIAL OF HIS FORMER CAMPAIGN CHAIRMAN, PAUL
    CAMPAIGN CHAIRMAN, PAUL MANAFORT.
    MANAFORT. TRUMP'S LEGAL TEAM IS STILL
    TRUMP'S LEGAL TEAM IS STILL TALKING TO MUELLER.
    TALKING TO MUELLER. THE JOURNAL REPORTS IT THIS WAY.
    THE JOURNAL REPORTS IT THIS WAY. TRUMP'S LEGAL TEAM SUBMITTED A
    TRUMP'S LEGAL TEAM SUBMITTED A COUNTEROFFER TO ROBERT MUELLER
    COUNTEROFFER TO ROBERT MUELLER ON A POSSIBLE INTERVIEW WITH THE
    ON A POSSIBLE INTERVIEW WITH THE PRESIDENT THAT ALLOWS FOR
    PRESIDENT THAT ALLOWS FOR QUESTIONS ABOUT COLLUSION WITH
    QUESTIONS ABOUT COLLUSION WITH RUSSIA, BUT CURTAIL INQUIREYIES
    RUSSIA, BUT CURTAIL INQUIREYIES RELATED TO OBSTRUCTION OF
    RELATED TO OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.
    JUSTICE. AS NEGOTIATIONS ARE SET TO ENTER
    AS NEGOTIATIONS ARE SET TO ENTER THE EIGHTH MONTH, A LAWYER FOR
    THE EIGHTH MONTH, A LAWYER FOR MR. TRUMP SAID AN INTERVIEW
    MR. TRUMP SAID AN INTERVIEW BETWEEN THE SPECIAL COUPLE AND
    BETWEEN THE SPECIAL COUPLE AND THE PRESIDENT IS STILL ON THE
    THE PRESIDENT IS STILL ON THE TABLE.
    TABLE. GIULIANI TOLD THE JOURNAL THE
    GIULIANI TOLD THE JOURNAL THE PRESIDENT'S LEGAL TEAM IS OPEN
    PRESIDENT'S LEGAL TEAM IS OPEN TO HIM ANSWERING QUESTIONS ABOUT
    TO HIM ANSWERING QUESTIONS ABOUT POSSIBLE COLLUSION WITH MOSCOW.
    POSSIBLE COLLUSION WITH MOSCOW. WHAT HAS THE PRESIDENT SAID
    WHAT HAS THE PRESIDENT SAID ABOUT THAT?
    ABOUT THAT? NO COLLUSION.
    NO COLLUSION. IN HIS NEWEST SWIPES, SDRUCHL
    IN HIS NEWEST SWIPES, SDRUCHL DESCRIBED IT AS A BIG HOAX AS
    DESCRIBED IT AS A BIG HOAX AS THE CONFLICTED AND DISCREDITED
    THE CONFLICTED AND DISCREDITED MUELLER WITCH HUNT AND A
    MUELLER WITCH HUNT AND A DISGRACE TO AMERICA THEY SHOULD
    DISGRACE TO AMERICA THEY SHOULD DROP THE HITCH WON THE NOW.
    DROP THE HITCH WON THE NOW. HE IS TAKING ON A HALF DOZEN
    HE IS TAKING ON A HALF DOZEN FORMER INTELLIGENCE OFFICIALS
    FORMER INTELLIGENCE OFFICIALS AND LOOKING AT POTENTIALLY
    AND LOOKING AT POTENTIALLY REVOKING THEIR SECURITY
    REVOKING THEIR SECURITY CLEARANCES INCLUDING FORMER CIA
    CLEARANCES INCLUDING FORMER CIA DIRECTOR AND THESE DAYS NBC NEWS
    DIRECTOR AND THESE DAYS NBC NEWS AND MSNBC ANALYST JOHN BRENNAN.
    AND MSNBC ANALYST JOHN BRENNAN. ONE THING ALL THE NAMES HAVE IN
    ONE THING ALL THE NAMES HAVE IN COMMON, THEY HAVE SPOKEN OUT
    COMMON, THEY HAVE SPOKEN OUT PUBLICLY AGAINST THIS PRESIDENT.
    PUBLICLY AGAINST THIS PRESIDENT. >> NOT ONLY IS THE PRESIDENT
    >> NOT ONLY IS THE PRESIDENT LOOKING TO TAKE AWAY BRENNAN'S
    LOOKING TO TAKE AWAY BRENNAN'S SECURITY CLEARANCE, HE IS
    SECURITY CLEARANCE, HE IS LOOKING INTO THE CLEARANCES OF
    LOOKING INTO THE CLEARANCES OF COMEY, CLAPPER, HAYDEN, RICE,
    COMEY, CLAPPER, HAYDEN, RICE, AND McCABE.
    AND McCABE. THE PRESIDENT IS EXPLORING THE
    THE PRESIDENT IS EXPLORING THE MECHANISMS BECAUSE THEY
    MECHANISMS BECAUSE THEY POLITICIZED AND IN SOME CASES
    POLITICIZED AND IN SOME CASES MONETIZED THEIR PUBLIC SERVICE
    MONETIZED THEIR PUBLIC SERVICE AND SECURITY CLEARANCES MAKING
    AND SECURITY CLEARANCES MAKING BASELESS ACCUSATIONS OF IMPROPER
    BASELESS ACCUSATIONS OF IMPROPER CONTACT WITH RUSSIA OR BEING
    CONTACT WITH RUSSIA OR BEING INFLUENCED IS EXTREMELY
    INFLUENCED IS EXTREMELY INAPPROPRIATE.
    INAPPROPRIATE. >> IN ADDITION BRENNAN, THE LIST
    >> IN ADDITION BRENNAN, THE LIST IS FORMER FBI DIRECTOR COMEY.
    IS FORMER FBI DIRECTOR COMEY. JAMES CLAPPER, DIRECTOR HAYDEN.
    JAMES CLAPPER, DIRECTOR HAYDEN. NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER SUSAN
    NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER SUSAN RICE, FBI NUMBER TWO, ANDREW
    RICE, FBI NUMBER TWO, ANDREW McCABE, TWO OF THEM, COMEY AND
    McCABE, TWO OF THEM, COMEY AND McCABE NO LONGER HAVE SECURITY
    McCABE NO LONGER HAVE SECURITY CLEARANCES.
    CLEARANCES. THE WHITE HOUSE ANNOUNCEMENT
    THE WHITE HOUSE ANNOUNCEMENT FOLLOWED A TWITTER NOTICE FROM
    FOLLOWED A TWITTER NOTICE FROM RAND PAUL OF KENTUCKY SAYING HE
    RAND PAUL OF KENTUCKY SAYING HE SAID ASK THE PRESIDENT TO REMOVE
    SAID ASK THE PRESIDENT TO REMOVE BRENNAN'S PRIVILEGES.
    BRENNAN'S PRIVILEGES. HE HAS BEEN VOCAL IN HIS
    HE HAS BEEN VOCAL IN HIS CRITICISM OF THE NEWS CONFERENCE
    CRITICISM OF THE NEWS CONFERENCE WITH PUTIN.
    WITH PUTIN. IT APPEARS TO HAVE STARTED ON
    IT APPEARS TO HAVE STARTED ON THE PRESIDENT'S CABLE NEWS
    THE PRESIDENT'S CABLE NEWS NETWORK OF CHOICE.
    NETWORK OF CHOICE. >> JOHN BRENNAN IS AN
    >> JOHN BRENNAN IS AN IRRESPONSIBLE PARTISAN COMBATANT
    IRRESPONSIBLE PARTISAN COMBATANT WHO WORKS FOR A CABLE NEWS
    WHO WORKS FOR A CABLE NEWS CHANNEL AND THREATENED THE
    CHANNEL AND THREATENED THE PRESIDENT ON TWITTER.
    PRESIDENT ON TWITTER. WHY WOULD HE HAVE A TOP SECRET
    WHY WOULD HE HAVE A TOP SECRET CLEARANCE?
    CLEARANCE? >> IF JOHN BRENNAN HAS TOP
    >> IF JOHN BRENNAN HAS TOP SECRET CLEARANCE, CAN HE
    SECRET CLEARANCE, CAN HE RESEARCH DONALD TRUMP AND HIS
    RESEARCH DONALD TRUMP AND HIS FAMILY?
    FAMILY? >> THAT SEEMS TO ECHO WHAT THE
    >> THAT SEEMS TO ECHO WHAT THE PRESIDENT TOLD CBS NEWS WHEN HE
    PRESIDENT TOLD CBS NEWS WHEN HE NAMED NAMES OF FORMER
    NAMED NAMES OF FORMER INTELLIGENCE OFFICIALS IN A LIST
    INTELLIGENCE OFFICIALS IN A LIST REMARKABLY SAMIMILAR TO WHAT WE
    REMARKABLY SAMIMILAR TO WHAT WE HEARD TODAY.
    HEARD TODAY. >> DO YOU THINK AGENCIES ARE OUT
    >> DO YOU THINK AGENCIES ARE OUT TO GET YOU?
    TO GET YOU? >> WELL CERTAINLY IN THE PAST.
    >> WELL CERTAINLY IN THE PAST. IT'S BEEN TERRIBLE.
    IT'S BEEN TERRIBLE. YOU LOOK AT BRENNAN, YOU LOOK AT
    YOU LOOK AT BRENNAN, YOU LOOK AT CLAPPER, YOU LOOK AT HAYDEN.
    CLAPPER, YOU LOOK AT HAYDEN. YOU LOOK AT COMEY.
    YOU LOOK AT COMEY. I HAVE NO CONFIDENCE IN A GUY
    I HAVE NO CONFIDENCE IN A GUY LIKE BRENNAN.
    LIKE BRENNAN. HE'S A TOTAL LOW LIFE.
    HE'S A TOTAL LOW LIFE. I HAVE NO CONFIDENCE IN CLAPPER.
    I HAVE NO CONFIDENCE IN CLAPPER. HE WROTE ME A BEAUTIFUL LETTER
    HE WROTE ME A BEAUTIFUL LETTER WHEN I FIRST WENT TO OFFICE.
    WHEN I FIRST WENT TO OFFICE. IT WAS REALLY NICE AND ALL OF A
    IT WAS REALLY NICE AND ALL OF A SUDDEN HE'S GONE HAY WIRE
    SUDDEN HE'S GONE HAY WIRE BECAUSE THEY GOT TO HIM AND
    BECAUSE THEY GOT TO HIM AND PROBABLY GOT HIM TO SAY THINGS
    PROBABLY GOT HIM TO SAY THINGS THAT MAYBE HE DOESN'T EVEN MEAN.
    THAT MAYBE HE DOESN'T EVEN MEAN. I CERTAINLY DON'T HAVE
    I CERTAINLY DON'T HAVE CONFIDENCE IN PAST PEOPLE.
    CONFIDENCE IN PAST PEOPLE. YOU LOOK AT WHAT'S HAPPENED.
    YOU LOOK AT WHAT'S HAPPENED. TAKE A LOOK AT ALL OF THE
    TAKE A LOOK AT ALL OF THE SHENANIGANS THAT HAVE GONE ON.
    SHENANIGANS THAT HAVE GONE ON. HARD TO HAVE CONFIDENCE.
    HARD TO HAVE CONFIDENCE. >> PETER BAKER IS CHIEF WHITE
    >> PETER BAKER IS CHIEF WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENT FOR THE "NEW
    HOUSE CORRESPONDENT FOR THE "NEW YORK TIMES" AND ASHLEY PARKER
    YORK TIMES" AND ASHLEY PARKER FOR "THE WASHINGTON POST" AND
    FOR "THE WASHINGTON POST" AND JEREMY BASH WHO HAPPENINGS TO BE
    JEREMY BASH WHO HAPPENINGS TO BE FORMER COUNSEL TO THE HOUSE
    FORMER COUNSEL TO THE HOUSE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE.
    INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE. BECAUSE YOU ARE THE FORMER FED,
    BECAUSE YOU ARE THE FORMER FED, I WOULD LIKE TO BEGIN WITH YOU.
    I WOULD LIKE TO BEGIN WITH YOU. WHY DO WE OFFER SECURITY
    WHY DO WE OFFER SECURITY CLEARANCES TO FORMER VERY SENIOR
    CLEARANCES TO FORMER VERY SENIOR RANKING INTELLIGENCE OFFICIALS
    RANKING INTELLIGENCE OFFICIALS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO
    INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO OUR FORMER CIA DIRECTORS ONCE
    OUR FORMER CIA DIRECTORS ONCE THEY LEFT OFFICE?
    THEY LEFT OFFICE? >> IT'S TO BENEFIT THE COUNTRY.
    >> IT'S TO BENEFIT THE COUNTRY. IT'S TO BENEFIT THE CURRENT
    IT'S TO BENEFIT THE CURRENT OCCUPANTS OF THE LEADERSHIP
    OCCUPANTS OF THE LEADERSHIP OFFICES SO THEY CAN CALL THEIR
    OFFICES SO THEY CAN CALL THEIR PREDECESSORS AND CONSULT ON
    PREDECESSORS AND CONSULT ON COMPLEX AND DIFFICULT ISSUE THAT
    COMPLEX AND DIFFICULT ISSUE THAT IS THE CURRENT HOLDERS MAY BE
    IS THE CURRENT HOLDERS MAY BE FACING.
    FACING. IT'S DONE TO SUPPORT THE
    IT'S DONE TO SUPPORT THE COUNTRY.
    COUNTRY. WHAT'S CRAZY ABOUT THIS MOVE BY
    WHAT'S CRAZY ABOUT THIS MOVE BY THE PRESIDENT IS THAT IF HE WERE
    THE PRESIDENT IS THAT IF HE WERE TO STRIP THEM OF SECURITY
    TO STRIP THEM OF SECURITY CLEARANCES, IT WOULDN'T HURT THE
    CLEARANCES, IT WOULDN'T HURT THE FORMER OFFICIALS AT ALL.
    FORMER OFFICIALS AT ALL. MOST OF THEM ARE DOING THINGS
    MOST OF THEM ARE DOING THINGS UNRELATED.
    UNRELATED. IT WOULD HURT THE CURRENCY
    IT WOULD HURT THE CURRENCY AGENCIES AND IT'S PART OF A LONG
    AGENCIES AND IT'S PART OF A LONG PRACTICE DATING BACK WHEN HE
    PRACTICE DATING BACK WHEN HE WENT TO THE CIA AND USED THE
    WENT TO THE CIA AND USED THE MEMORIAL WALL THROUGH DOUBTING
    MEMORIAL WALL THROUGH DOUBTING THE INTELLIGENCE ASSESSMENTS AND
    THE INTELLIGENCE ASSESSMENTS AND ATTACKS ON THE AGENCIES THROUGH
    ATTACKS ON THE AGENCIES THROUGH THIS WEEKEND WHEN HE CALLED THE
    THIS WEEKEND WHEN HE CALLED THE WHOLE ASSESSMENT ABOUT RUSSIA A
    WHOLE ASSESSMENT ABOUT RUSSIA A HOAX AS PART OF A LONG PATTERN
    HOAX AS PART OF A LONG PATTERN OF ATTACKING THE U.S.
    OF ATTACKING THE U.S. INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES.
    INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES. >> OUR CURRENT CIA GETS A
    >> OUR CURRENT CIA GETS A PICTURE OF THE PEOPLE AROUND KIM
    PICTURE OF THE PEOPLE AROUND KIM JONG UN, A LONG TIME FORMER
    JONG UN, A LONG TIME FORMER PLAYER IS MISSING FROM THE
    PLAYER IS MISSING FROM THE PICTURE.
    PICTURE. THEY CALL BRENNAN AND SAY WHAT
    THEY CALL BRENNAN AND SAY WHAT WERE YOUR DEALINGS?
    WERE YOUR DEALINGS? >> THAT'S A GREAT EXAMPLE OR IF
    >> THAT'S A GREAT EXAMPLE OR IF YOU ARE WORKING WITH ANOTHER
    YOU ARE WORKING WITH ANOTHER INTELLIGENCE SERVICE AND WANT
    INTELLIGENCE SERVICE AND WANT ADVICE ABOUT HOW TO HANDLE THE
    ADVICE ABOUT HOW TO HANDLE THE CURRENT PLAYERS IF THEY ARE
    CURRENT PLAYERS IF THEY ARE STILL IN OFFICE.
    STILL IN OFFICE. YOU CALL YOUR PREDECESSOR AND
    YOU CALL YOUR PREDECESSOR AND SAY HOW DO YOU DEAL WITH THIS?
    SAY HOW DO YOU DEAL WITH THIS? >> ASHLEY, YOU ARE LISTENING TO
    >> ASHLEY, YOU ARE LISTENING TO SARAH HUCKABEE SANDERS WITH THE
    SARAH HUCKABEE SANDERS WITH THE REST OF US AND THIS PART OF THE
    REST OF US AND THIS PART OF THE BRIEFING COMES UP AND ONE WORD
    BRIEFING COMES UP AND ONE WORD STUCK OUT AT YOU AND THAT WAS
    STUCK OUT AT YOU AND THAT WAS MONITIZE.
    MONITIZE. TO HEAR YOU TELLING IT, IT'S ONE
    TO HEAR YOU TELLING IT, IT'S ONE THING TO CRITICIZE THE
    THING TO CRITICIZE THE PRESIDENT, BUT HE THINKS YOU ARE
    PRESIDENT, BUT HE THINKS YOU ARE MONETIZING ANY PIECE OF HIM,
    MONETIZING ANY PIECE OF HIM, MONETIZING THE PRESIDENCY IS
    MONETIZING THE PRESIDENCY IS WHAT THE TRUMP FAMILY HAS BEEN
    WHAT THE TRUMP FAMILY HAS BEEN ACCUSED OF SINCE HE TOOK THE
    ACCUSED OF SINCE HE TOOK THE OATH.
    OATH. IF HE THINKS YOU ARE MONETIZING
    IF HE THINKS YOU ARE MONETIZING HIM, THAT CROSSES A RHETT LINEED
    HIM, THAT CROSSES A RHETT LINEED >> SARAH SANDERS SAID
    >> SARAH SANDERS SAID SPECIFICALLY THAT WORD MONITIZE.
    SPECIFICALLY THAT WORD MONITIZE. THE PRESIDENT DOESN'T LIKE
    THE PRESIDENT DOESN'T LIKE CRITICS.
    CRITICS. HE DOESN'T LIKE PEOPLE WHO
    HE DOESN'T LIKE PEOPLE WHO WORKED FOR PAST ADMINISTRATIONS
    WORKED FOR PAST ADMINISTRATIONS ESPECIALLY PRESIDENT OBAMA.
    ESPECIALLY PRESIDENT OBAMA. ONE OF THE THINGS OTHER THAN THE
    ONE OF THE THINGS OTHER THAN THE ORIGINAL SIN OF RUSSIA THAT JUST
    ORIGINAL SIN OF RUSSIA THAT JUST REALLY DRIVES HIM CRAZY IS THIS
    REALLY DRIVES HIM CRAZY IS THIS IDEA THAT PEOPLE ARE GETTING
    IDEA THAT PEOPLE ARE GETTING RICH OFF OF HIM, RICH USING HIS
    RICH OFF OF HIM, RICH USING HIS NAME, RICH CRITICIZING HIM.
    NAME, RICH CRITICIZING HIM. ON A SIDE NOTE, ONE INTERESTING
    ON A SIDE NOTE, ONE INTERESTING THING I LEARN SIDE STEVE BANNON
    THING I LEARN SIDE STEVE BANNON FOR INSTANCE, ONE OF THE REASONS
    FOR INSTANCE, ONE OF THE REASONS HE IS NOT IN THE ADMINISTRATION
    HE IS NOT IN THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT JUST BECAUSE HE CROSSED
    IS NOT JUST BECAUSE HE CROSSED THE PRESIDENT ON RUSSIA, BUT THE
    THE PRESIDENT ON RUSSIA, BUT THE PRESIDENT BELIEVES INCORRECTLY
    PRESIDENT BELIEVES INCORRECTLY THAT STEVE BANNON MADE MONEY OFF
    THAT STEVE BANNON MADE MONEY OFF OF MICHAEL WOLF'S BOOK.
    OF MICHAEL WOLF'S BOOK. SO THAT HE GOT KRITCRITICAL OF T
    SO THAT HE GOT KRITCRITICAL OF T ADMINISTRATION AND THE FACT THAT
    ADMINISTRATION AND THE FACT THAT SHE USED THAT WORD WAS TELLING.
    SHE USED THAT WORD WAS TELLING. WHEN YOU LISTEN TO OTHER AIDES
    WHEN YOU LISTEN TO OTHER AIDES TALK ABOUT PEOPLE WHO THEY THINK
    TALK ABOUT PEOPLE WHO THEY THINK ARE MAKING MONEY WITH BOOKS OR
    ARE MAKING MONEY WITH BOOKS OR CRITICIZING THE PRESIDENT, IT'S
    CRITICIZING THE PRESIDENT, IT'S SOMETHING THAT BOTHERS THEM
    SOMETHING THAT BOTHERS THEM ACROSS THE BOARD.
    ACROSS THE BOARD. >> PETER BAKER, AS I MENTIONED,
    >> PETER BAKER, AS I MENTIONED, HELSINKI WAS A WEEK AGO TONIGHT
    HELSINKI WAS A WEEK AGO TONIGHT WE WERE TALKING ABOUT THAT.
    WE WERE TALKING ABOUT THAT. FOR A WHITE HOUSE TIRCHGS CHANGE
    FOR A WHITE HOUSE TIRCHGS CHANGE THE SUBJECT TO ANYTHING BUT,
    THE SUBJECT TO ANYTHING BUT, THIS WOULD MAKE A NIFTY SHINY
    THIS WOULD MAKE A NIFTY SHINY OBJECT, BUT HOW ABOUT SHINY
    OBJECT, BUT HOW ABOUT SHINY OBJECT DISCIPLINE WHEN YOU THINK
    OBJECT DISCIPLINE WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT THE FACT THAT TWO OF THE
    ABOUT THE FACT THAT TWO OF THE NAMES ON THEIR LIST POTENTIALLY
    NAMES ON THEIR LIST POTENTIALLY GETTING THEIR SECURITY
    GETTING THEIR SECURITY CLEARANCES PULLED NOT EVEN HAVE
    CLEARANCES PULLED NOT EVEN HAVE SECURITY CLEARANCES.
    SECURITY CLEARANCES. >> IT'S NOT A WELL THOUGHT OUT
    >> IT'S NOT A WELL THOUGHT OUT IDEA WHEN YOU PUT ON PEOPLE WHO
    IDEA WHEN YOU PUT ON PEOPLE WHO DON'T EVEN HAVE A SECURITY
    DON'T EVEN HAVE A SECURITY CLEARANCES.
    CLEARANCES. DWLEENG IT'S DRIVEN OUT THE IDEA
    DWLEENG IT'S DRIVEN OUT THE IDEA THAT THIS IS A PRESIDENT WHO HAS
    THAT THIS IS A PRESIDENT WHO HAS A RELATIONSHIP WITH RUSSIA AND
    A RELATIONSHIP WITH RUSSIA AND IS UNDER INVESTIGATION.
    IS UNDER INVESTIGATION. WHAT HE IS SAYING IS IF YOU
    WHAT HE IS SAYING IS IF YOU QUESTION ME, I WILL FIND A WAY
    QUESTION ME, I WILL FIND A WAY TO PENALIZE YOU FOR THAT.
    TO PENALIZE YOU FOR THAT. IT EXTENDS THE QUESTIONS ABOUT
    IT EXTENDS THE QUESTIONS ABOUT HIS RELATIONSHIP WITH VLADIMIR
    HIS RELATIONSHIP WITH VLADIMIR PUTIN RATHER THAN DISTRACTING
    PUTIN RATHER THAN DISTRACTING FROM THEM.
    FROM THEM. WHAT IS HE SO AFRAID OF IF HE
    WHAT IS HE SO AFRAID OF IF HE DOESN'T HAVE A RELATIONSHIP THAT
    DOESN'T HAVE A RELATIONSHIP THAT HE WANTS THESE PEOPLE TO BE
    HE WANTS THESE PEOPLE TO BE CUTOFF FROM INFORMATION.
    CUTOFF FROM INFORMATION. HE DOESN'T WANT THEM TO HAVE
    HE DOESN'T WANT THEM TO HAVE ACCESS TO CLASSIFIED DATA AND
    ACCESS TO CLASSIFIED DATA AND THEREFORE GIVES THE IMPRESSION
    THEREFORE GIVES THE IMPRESSION OF SOMEBODY WHO IS TRYING TO
    OF SOMEBODY WHO IS TRYING TO PUNISH ENEMIES AND PREVENT
    PUNISH ENEMIES AND PREVENT PEOPLE WHO MIGHT SAY THINGS HE
    Lordy, We've Got The Tape. Donald Trump-Michael Cohen Recording Is Released. | The 11th Hour | MSNBC Iraq Vet, Rep. Seth Moulton, Criticizes President Trump's Twitter Threats | Morning Joe | MSNBC Michael Cohen Donald Trump Tape Offers Bevy Of New Leads For Investigators | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC Lawrence: Vladimir Putin Made A Big Mistake In His Presser With Donald Trump | The Last Word | MSNBC Amy Klobuchar: President Trump 'Wants To Create An Alternate Reality' (Full) | MTP Daily | MSNBC Joe: White House Has Another Dull Idea Wrapped In Camouflage | Morning Joe | MSNBC Bad News For Paul Manafort Seen In Naming Of New Witnesses | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC Amazon Raking In Billions, Some Employees Relying On Food Stamps | Velshi & Ruhle | MSNBC Clapper On President Donald Trump Revoking Security Clearance: Very Petty | Hardball | MSNBC Estallan reacciones contra Trump tras reunión con Putin - Foro Global